Humanities and Society Review

An Open access peer reviewed international Journal.
Publication Frequency- Bimonthly
Publisher Name-APEC Publisher.

ISSN Online- 3105-1987
Country of origin-South Africa
Language- English

The Converging and Diverging Facts of Local Governance (Decentralisation) in Cameroon History, 1961-2010

Independence in Cameroon brought fundamental changes in government and administration. The state began with a Federal structure and two state governments that lasted for ten years. On 20 May 1972, President Ahidjo supplanted the Federal arrangement with a unitary constitution, aiming to consolidate national unity and enhance economic, social, and cultural development. This study examines how landmark legislations such as the Local Council Law of 1974 and the Chieftaincy Decree of 1977 impinged on local governance and development. Using primary archival sources from the National Archives Buea (NAB) and Bamenda Provincial Archives (BPA), government decrees, official gazettes, and legal texts, combined with secondary scholarly literature, this research adopts a chronological approach to analyze the evolution of decentralization in Cameroon from 1961 to 2010. The study reveals persistent tensions between centralization and decentralization, between chiefs and state administrators, and between East and West Cameroon institutional systems. In designing new local council regulations, the government harmonized East and West Cameroon structures, but predominantly retained the former East Cameroon managerial system (Instrument de Commandement des Communes Rurales), creating incompatibility issues that persist today in both culture and practice. The concentration of central finance, public service authority, and control of local communities in Yaoundé created structural impediments to effective decentralization. The 1996 constitutional reform introduced the concept of a decentralized unitary state, while the 2004 decentralization laws established frameworks for transferring powers to regional and local authorities. However, implementation gaps between legal provisions and practical reality remain significant. This study concludes that effective decentralization in Cameroon is possible when divergent historical facts are understood and resolved, coupled with genuine political will to devolve power to local communities.

The Converging and Diverging Facts of Local Governance (Decentralisation) in Cameroon History, 1961-2010

Keywords

Converging Diverging Local Governance Decentralisation Cameroon

Authors

Divine Fuhnwi Ngwa Department of History FALSH University of Ngaoundere Cameroon

Abstract

Independence in Cameroon brought fundamental changes in government and administration. The state began with a Federal structure and two state governments that lasted for ten years. On 20 May 1972, President Ahidjo supplanted the Federal arrangement with a unitary constitution, aiming to consolidate national unity and enhance economic, social, and cultural development. This study examines how landmark legislations such as the Local Council Law of 1974 and the Chieftaincy Decree of 1977 impinged on local governance and development. Using primary archival sources from the National Archives Buea (NAB) and Bamenda Provincial Archives (BPA), government decrees, official gazettes, and legal texts, combined with secondary scholarly literature, this research adopts a chronological approach to analyze the evolution of decentralization in Cameroon from 1961 to 2010. The study reveals persistent tensions between centralization and decentralization, between chiefs and state administrators, and between East and West Cameroon institutional systems. In designing new local council regulations, the government harmonized East and West Cameroon structures, but predominantly retained the former East Cameroon managerial system (Instrument de Commandement des Communes Rurales), creating incompatibility issues that persist today in both culture and practice. The concentration of central finance, public service authority, and control of local communities in Yaoundé created structural impediments to effective decentralization. The 1996 constitutional reform introduced the concept of a decentralized unitary state, while the 2004 decentralization laws established frameworks for transferring powers to regional and local authorities. However, implementation gaps between legal provisions and practical reality remain significant. This study concludes that effective decentralization in Cameroon is possible when divergent historical facts are understood and resolved, coupled with genuine political will to devolve power to local communities.

Scroll to Top